Published by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) in late June 2025, a new Today in Energy feature reveals a striking projection: electricity usage for commercial computing—including AI servers, cloud infrastructure, and office hardware—could soon surpass space cooling, lighting, and ventilation combined in the U.S. commercial sector U.S. Energy Information Administration+9U.S. Energy Information Administration+9Facebook+9.
⚡ What’s Driving the Trend?
AI, data centers, and cloud services are rapidly scaling up, pushing power demand higher.
According to the EIA’s Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), computing is now one of the fast-growing end uses in commercial electricity consumption U.S. Energy Information Administration+15U.S. Energy Information Administration+15Reuters+15EnerKnol+11U.S. Energy Information Administration+11U.S. Energy Information Administration+11.
Forecasts suggest computing electricity usage could rise to capture ~20% of total U.S. commercial electricity by 2050, overtaking HVAC and lighting U.S. Energy Information Administration+15LinkedIn+15EnerKnol+15.
🔍 Why It Matters
Cooling was long the dominant energy draw in commercial buildings; if computing overtakes it, we're staring at a fundamental shift in energy demand profiles.
The trend portends accelerating electricity demand growth, particularly as AI workloads and cryptomining become electrification drivers in places like Virginia and Texas.
🔌 Grid Under Stress: Recent Peaks & Future Challenges
The context for EIA’s projection is already unfolding. In late July 2025, electricity demand in the Lower 48 states hit 759,180 MW—a new all‑time high—largely due to extreme heat and data center load growth WikipediaReuters.
EIA now forecasts annual U.S. electricity demand to grow by just over 2% in both 2025 and 2026. Regions like Northern Virginia and Texas, with their concentration of hyperscale computing facilities, are expected to lead that surge U.S. Energy Information Administration+5Reuters+5OnLocation,+5.
🌱 Green Computing: Mitigations & Opportunities
1. Immersion Cooling & High‑Efficiency Design
Advanced cooling methods—like liquid immersion—can slash data center energy waste. Immersion cooling has demonstrated up to 50% reductions in energy use and substantial space savings compared to traditional air cooling arXiv. Modern facilities are targeting PUEs near 1.2—or even 1.01—to minimize overhead power consumption Wikipedia+1.
2. Consolidation & Virtualization
By eliminating underutilized servers and consolidating workloads, operators can dramatically cut power and cooling needs. Studies suggest optimizing server utilization alone can reduce energy use by 6–44% arXiv+1.
3. Renewable Integration & Waste‑Heat Reuse
Leading cloud providers are pursuing Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) and Carbon Usage Effectiveness (CUE) targets, deploying renewables, direct‑current systems, and even waste-heat reuse, such as using data center exhaust to heat nearby buildings arXiv+8Wikipedia+8Wikipedia+8.
🛠 What This Means for AI Stakeholders
If you're building AI services or managing data infrastructure:
Plan for energy growth: your deployments are part of a broader trend that could stress grid capacity.
Track efficiency metrics: monitor PUE, and consider advanced cooling or edge computing to offset centralized consumption.
Engage with utilities: many regions offer rebate programs and green incentives for deploying energy‑efficient IT and cooling systems WikipediaWikipedia.
🧩 Final Thoughts
This isn’t just a statistic—it’s a wake‑up call for the AI industry and cloud infrastructure community. As computational demand transforms electricity consumption patterns, energy-efficient design and green innovation won’t just be sustainability goals—they will be operational necessities.
Let me know if you’d like visuals, data breakdowns, or a deeper dive into cooling innovations and grid planning.
In "final thoughts" Justin says we'll need "green innovation." To me, this indicates a serious misunderstanding of the power generation situation. Green initiatives - solar, wind, demonization of coal and nuclear - have very clearly and famously held back our power generation growth. It's been part of the green movement's intention. The environmental movement, at bottom, is pro-earth (pantheist) and anti-human and always argues for less power. To have any chance whatever of meeting the vast new demands for power, we need to ditch the whole green movement and anything associated with it. That much should be perfectly clear. Not sure about Justin.